수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제 Day 12 변형문제

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제

Day 12 변형문제

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제 변형문제

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제 변형문제

 

전문항 확인 하러가기!

https://themakings.co.kr/421/?idx=1539

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제 DAY 12 변형문제(PDF)

 

---

지문 해석

수백 명의 행동과학자들이 다윈의 진화론을 빌려와 수정했다. 이 방대한 문헌에서 가장 성공적인 발견 중 하나는 사람, 지식, 활동, 조직 구조의 다양성이 창의성과 혁신에 필수적이라는 것이다. Dean Keith Simonton의 연구는 모차르트, 셰익스피어, 피카소, 아인슈타인, 다윈 자신과 같은 개인 천재들의 성공이 진화적 관점에서 가장 잘 이해된다는 것을 보여준다. 이 유명한 창작자들은 동시대인들보다 더 넓은 범위의 아이디어를 생산하고 더 많은 작품을 완성했다. 그들은 다른 사람들보다 더 높은 성공률을 가진 것이 아니다. 그저 더 많이 했을 뿐이다. 그래서 더 많은 성공과 더 많은 실패 모두를 가졌다. 이 추세를 거스르는 저명한 천재들이 있지만, 그들은 전형적으로 더 다작한 상대에 비해 영향력이 적다. 위대한 화가 Vermeer는 일생 동안 50점 미만의 그림을 그렸고, 모두 비슷한 스타일이었다. 그는 탁월한 경지에 도달했지만, 그 놀라운 아름다움에도 불구하고 피카소의 비할 데 없는 범위와 역사를 바꾼 영향력에 비하면 무언가 부족하다.

 

---

 

풀이 흐름

이 지문의 핵심 논지는 "위대한 창작자들의 비결은 높은 성공률이 아니라 압도적인 생산량이다"라는 것이다. 이 논지를 가장 명확히 전달하는 두 문장을 정확히 읽는 것이 핵심이다.

지문은 "They didn't succeed at a higher rate than others. They just did more."라고 명시한다. 즉, 유명한 창작자들은 다른 사람들보다 성공률이 "높지 않았다(didn't succeed at a higher rate)". 그저 "더 많이 했을 뿐(just did more)"이며, 그 결과 더 많은 성공과 더 많은 실패 모두를 경험한 것이다.

따라서 유명한 창작자들이 "다른 사람들보다 더 높은 성공률 때문에(because they had a higher rate of success)" 성공했다고 서술하는 선지가 있다면, 이는 지문이 명시적으로 부정한 내용과 정면으로 모순된다.

---

전체 선지 분석

 

선지	판정	근거
① Behavioral scientists have applied modified versions of Darwin's evolutionary theory to study creativity.	✅ 일치	지문의 "Hundreds of behavioral scientists have borrowed and modified Darwin's theory of evolution" + 창의성 연구 맥락과 직접 대응.
② Famous creators achieved success because they had a higher rate of success compared to others.	❌ 불일치	지문은 "They didn't succeed at a higher rate than others. They just did more."라고 명시. had a higher rate of success ↔ didn't succeed at a higher rate로 정반대. 성공의 원인은 높은 성공률이 아니라 더 많은 생산량이다.
③ Research suggests that the success of individual geniuses is best seen from an evolutionary perspective.	✅ 일치	지문의 "the success of individual geniuses... is best seen from an evolutionary perspective"와 직접 대응.
④ One celebrated artist created fewer than fifty paintings in his lifetime, all in a similar style.	✅ 일치	지문의 "Vermeer created fewer than 50 paintings in his lifetime, all in a similar style"와 정확히 대응.
⑤ There are renowned geniuses who go against the general trend of producing a large volume of work.	✅ 일치	지문의 "There are renowned geniuses who defy this trend"와 일치. go against = defy, general trend = this trend(다작 경향).

 

---

핵심 문장 정리

"They didn't succeed at a higher rate than others. They just did more."

이 두 문장이 ②번 선지의 오류를 판별하는 결정적 근거다. 지문은 유명한 창작자들이 다른 사람들보다 성공률이 "높지 않았다(didn't succeed at a higher rate)"고 명시적으로 부정하며, 그저 "더 많이 했을 뿐(just did more)"이라고 서술하는 반면, ②번은 "더 높은 성공률 때문에(because they had a higher rate of success)" 성공했다고 정반대로 서술했다.

---

 

한 줄 정리

유명한 창작자들은 "더 높은 성공률" 때문에 성공한 것이 아니라, "더 많이 시도했기" 때문에 더 많은 성공과 실패 모두를 경험한 것이다.

 

 

---

The Makings의 DAY 12  변형문제는

총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다.

 

1. 빈칸 채우기(객관식)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 문단 재배열 하기(객관식)

---

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제

DAY 12(44문항) 변형문제의 지문입니다.

 

1번 지문

Hundreds of behavioral scientists have borrowed and modified Darwin's theory of evolution. One of the most successful findings in this vast literature is that variance in people, knowledge, activities, and organizational structures is vital to creativity and innovation. Research by Dean Keith Simonton shows that the success of individual geniuses like Mozart, Shakespeare, Picasso, Einstein, and Darwin himself, is best seen from an evolutionary perspective. These famous creators produced a wider range of ideas and finished more products than their contemporaries. They didn't succeed at a higher rate than others. They just did more. So they had both more successes and more failures. There are renowned geniuses who defy this trend, but they typically have less impact than their more productive counterparts. The great artist Vermeer created fewer than 50 paintings in his lifetime, all in a similar style. He achieved a singular excellence that, despite the stunning beauty of his art, adds something less than Picasso's unparalleled range and history-changing influence.

 

2번 지문

The response to art is based on a number of objective and subjective factors. These include taste, values, and tradition, as well as gender, education, emotions, and many more. Most art in the world today was created in past centuries for audiences that differed substantially from contemporary ones. Although art from the past continues to intrigue modern spectators, it is impossible to respond to art in the same way as the original audience. This should not suggest that art from previous centuries cannot be fully understood or valued. Rather, it underlines that art is appreciated on terms compatible with contemporary culture. Today's viewers think, speak, and behave very differently not only from Renaissance but also early twentieth-century audiences. It would be impossible for them to respond to, experience, and look at art in the same way as someone from the 1500s or even the 1950s.

 

3번 지문

We learn the meanings of practically all our words, not from dictionaries, but from hearing these noises as they accompany actual situations in life and learning to associate certain noises with certain situations. We all learn to interpret language by being aware of contexts. The "definitions" given by little children in school show clearly how they associate words with situations. They almost always define words in terms of physical and social context: Punishment is when you have been bad and your parents don't let you play outside. That is a good definition. The main reason that it cannot be used in dictionaries is that it is too specific; it would be impossible to list the myriad situations in which the word has been used. For this reason, dictionaries give definitions on a high level of abstraction; that is, with particular references left out for the sake of conciseness. This is why it is a great mistake to regard a dictionary definition as telling us all about a word.

 

4번 지문

The patent system is one of the main instruments governments use to promote research and development. Patenting an idea gives its inventor a 20-year monopoly to exploit the fruit of his labor in the marketplace, in exchange for publishing a full account of how the new product, process, or material works. Most economists would argue that, without a patent system, even fewer inventions would lead to successful innovations. But what if patents actually discourage the combining and recombining of inventions to yield new products and processes ─ as has happened in biotechnology, genetics, and other disciplines? Unlike the informal system that scientists use for sharing intellectual credit, the patent system is winner take all. Whoever gets his or her application approved first gets all the money. That creates an incentive for concealment ─ if scientists' ideas leak out, someone else could file the patent more quickly. But secrecy is the enemy of science. All really great breakthroughs are actually a chain of small discoveries. Each team of scientists eagerly reads the latest results from other labs and adds some small but brilliant insights of their own. But if billion-dollar patents are at stake, universities ─ which end up owning much of the intellectual property that comes out of professors' discoveries ─ have a strong incentive to pressure their scholars to keep new findings and ideas under wraps. Hence, there is growing concern among academic scholars and policy makers that patent rights are themselves slowing innovation.