2026년 고3 7월 모의고사 변형문제 지문 [29,30,31,32,33,34]

 

2026년 고3 7월 모의고사

변형문제 지문

[29,30,31,32,33,34]

2026년 7월 고3 모의고사 변형문제

2026년 고3 7월 모의고사 변형문제

 

 

전문항 보러가기!

https://themakings.co.kr/403/?idx=1415

2026년 고3 7월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 3 (66문항) (PDF)

 

 

---

 

다음 지문을 읽고 글의 내용과 다른 문장을 고르세요.

 

To date, the focus of much of the research in medicine and the health sciences has understandably been on disease processes. Research on the physiological mechanisms linking mind and body has also focused primarily on the negative consequences of factors such as stress, trauma and ageing. Whereas a large body of research exists detailing the relationship between functioning of the brain and that of systems such as the autonomic, endocrine and immune systems, most of this research has focused on negative outcomes. It is becoming clear that well-being and ill-being may have biological, psychological, social and spiritual causes that are only partially overlapping and attempting to understand the body during states of wellness rather than under conditions of illness is essentially a paradigm shift in thinking. The positive health construct points to the intriguing possibility that the physiological mechanisms underlying thriving may be unique and may not merely mirror those underlying disease and illness. For example, the impact of well-being on secretion patterns of such hormones as cortisol, serotonin and oxytocin is not just the opposite to that of stress and distress.

 

① Medical research has traditionally focused on understanding disease processes.

② Studies on the mind-body connection have primarily examined negative factors like stress.

③ Studying wellness rather than illness is a minor extension of existing research.

④ The positive health construct suggests thriving mechanisms may be unique.

⑤ Hormones like cortisol respond to well-being differently than to stress.

---

지문 내용 정리

 

이 글은 기존 의학 연구가 질병에만 집중해왔다는 문제의식과, 웰빙(wellness) 연구의 새로운 패러다임을 제시하는 논설문이에요. 지금까지 의학과 건강과학 연구는 주로 질병 과정(disease processes)에 초점을 맞춰왔어요. 심신 연결에 관한 연구도 스트레스·트라우마·노화 같은 부정적 요인의 결과에 집중해왔죠. 자율신경계·내분비계·면역계와 뇌 기능의 관계를 다룬 방대한 연구들도 대부분 부정적 결과에 초점을 맞추고 있어요.

 

그런데 이제 새로운 시각이 등장하고 있어요: 웰빙과 질병에는 부분적으로만 겹치는 생물학적·심리적·사회적·영적 원인이 있을 수 있고, 질병 상태가 아닌 건강 상태의 신체를 이해하려는 시도는 본질적으로 패러다임의 전환(paradigm shift)이라는 거예요.

더 나아가 "긍정적 건강 구성체(positive health construct)"는 번성(thriving)의 생리적 메커니즘이 질병의 메커니즘과 단순히 반대 방향이 아닌, 고유하게 다를 수 있다는 흥미로운 가능성을 제시해요. 예를 들어, 코르티솔·세로토닌·옥시토신 같은 호르몬 분비 패턴에 대한 웰빙의 영향은 스트레스의 영향과 단순히 반대인 게 아니라는 거예요.

 

③번 함정의 포인트: 원문은 웰빙 연구가 "패러다임의 전환"이라고 했는데, ③번은 이걸 "기존 연구의 사소한 확장"으로 축소했어요.

---

선택지 O/X 분석

 

번호	선택지 요약	원문 대조	판정
①	의학 연구는 전통적으로 질병 과정 이해에 집중해왔음	"the focus of much of the research in medicine and the health sciences has... been on disease processes"	⭕ 일치
②	심신 연결에 관한 연구는 주로 스트레스 같은 부정적 요인을 살펴봐왔음	"Research on the physiological mechanisms linking mind and body has also focused primarily on the negative consequences of factors such as stress"	⭕ 일치
③	질병이 아닌 웰빙을 연구하는 것은 기존 연구의 사소한 확장임	"attempting to understand the body during states of wellness... is essentially a paradigm shift in thinking" — 사소한 확장이 아니라 패러다임의 전환	❌ 불일치
④	긍정적 건강 구성체는 번성의 메커니즘이 고유할 수 있다고 시사함	"the physiological mechanisms underlying thriving may be unique and may not merely mirror those underlying disease"	⭕ 일치
⑤	코르티솔 같은 호르몬은 스트레스와 다르게 웰빙에 반응함	"the impact of well-being on secretion patterns of such hormones as cortisol... is not just the opposite to that of stress and distress"	⭕ 일치

 

---

정답은 ③ — 함정 패턴: 혁신적 전환을 사소한 확장으로 축소(paradigm shift → minor extension)

이번 함정은 글이 "혁명적"이라고 강조한 것을 "사소한 것"으로 격하시키는 패턴이에요.

원문은 이렇게 말합니다:

"attempting to understand the body during states of wellness rather than under conditions of illness is essentially a paradigm shift in thinking."

 

"패러다임의 전환(paradigm shift)" — 이건 단순한 연구 방향 조정이 아니라 사고 틀 자체가 바뀌는 근본적 변화를 의미하는 표현이에요.

그런데 ③번은 이걸 이렇게 바꿔놓았어요:

"Studying wellness rather than illness is a minor extension of existing research."

(질병이 아닌 웰빙을 연구하는 것은 기존 연구의 사소한 확장이다)

 

"paradigm shift(패러다임의 전환)" → "minor extension(사소한 확장)"

"사고의 틀 자체가 바뀌는 혁신"을 "기존 것에 조금 덧붙이는 것"으로 완전히 격하시켰어요. 의미의 규모와 중요도를 정반대 수준으로 축소한 거예요.

함정 유형 정리: 중요도 격하(paradigm shift → minor extension)

지문에서 "paradigm shift, revolutionary, fundamentally different, essentially new" 같은 혁신·전환을 강조하는 표현이 나오면, 선택지에서 이게 "minor, slight, small, extension of existing" 같은 사소함·연속성 표현으로 격하되어 있지 않은지 확인하세요. 이 패턴은 특히 학술·논설 지문에서 필자가 자신의 주장의 혁신성을 강조하는 문장을 공략할 때 자주 등장해요.

 

---

핵심 어휘 정리

 

• paradigm shift — 패러다임의 전환 (사고 틀의 근본적 변화)
• physiological mechanisms — 생리적 메커니즘
• autonomic / endocrine / immune system — 자율신경계 / 내분비계 / 면역계
• well-being / ill-being — 웰빙 / 불건강
• thriving — 번성, 잘 살아가는 상태
• cortisol / serotonin / oxytocin — 코르티솔 / 세로토닌 / 옥시토신 (호르몬)
• minor extension — 사소한 확장 (선택지의 함정 표현)
• partially overlapping — 부분적으로 겹치는

---

풀이 전략 팁

 

학술 논설문에서 필자가 자신의 주장이나 새로운 연구 방향의 중요성을 강조하는 문장은 출제자가 즐겨 공략하는 포인트예요. 이런 문장들은 보통 이렇게 생겼어요:

• "This is essentially a paradigm shift..."
• "This represents a fundamental departure from..."
• "This is not merely an extension of..."
• "This is a revolutionary approach..."

선택지에서 이런 표현들이 "minor", "slight", "just another", "extension of existing"으로 격하되어 있다면 바로 함정이에요. 반대 방향의 함정도 있어요 — 필자가 "이것은 하나의 가능성일 뿐"이라고 겸손하게 서술한 걸 "이것은 확실히 혁명적이다"로 과장하는 케이스요. 이번엔 전자(혁신 → 사소함)였지만, 두 방향 모두 주의하세요. 핵심은 필자가 부여한 중요도의 수준을 정확히 파악하고 선택지가 그 수준을 유지하는지 비교하는 거예요.

---

The Makings의 2026년 고3 7월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제는

총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다.

 

1. 빈칸 채우기(객관식)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 문단 재배열 하기(객관식)

 

---

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한

2026년 고3 7월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 3의 지문입니다.

 

1번 지문(문항 번호 29번)

To date, the focus of much of the research in medicine and the health sciences has understandably been on disease processes. Research on the physiological mechanisms linking mind and body has also focused primarily on the negative consequences of factors such as stress, trauma and ageing. Whereas a large body of research exists detailing the relationship between functioning of the brain and that of systems such as the autonomic, endocrine and immune systems, most of this research has focused on negative outcomes. It is becoming clear that well-being and ill-being may have biological, psychological, social and spiritual causes that are only partially overlapping and attempting to understand the body during states of wellness rather than under conditions of illness is essentially a paradigm shift in thinking. The positive health construct points to the intriguing possibility that the physiological mechanisms underlying thriving may be unique and may not merely mirror those underlying disease and illness. For example, the impact of well-being on secretion patterns of such hormones as cortisol, serotonin and oxytocin is not just the opposite to that of stress and distress.

 

2번 지문(문항 번호 30번)

Distinction is valuable because it provides definition. If everyone were identical, it would be hard to have any sense of self. Where would that self start and others end? Differentiation helps establish a sense of identity. Defining both who someone is and isn't. This often plays out as children become young adults. Up until age twelve or thirteen, children are essentially extensions of their parents. They dress the way their parents dress them, eat what their parents cooked, and live where their parents live. They're not clones of their parents (children certainly talk back or hate particular foods), but they've done little to differentiate themselves. Part of becoming an adult, though, is about defining a unique self. One that's separate from one's parents. So teens rebel. They become vegan, date bad boys or girls, and generally look bored or irritated whenever their parents pick them up from school. Teens aren't just trying to upset their parents (although it might seem that way); they're trying to define themselves as unique and distinct. Creating a boundary where their identity starts and their parents' ends.

 

3번 지문(문항 번호 31번)

Politics and economics differ radically in the way they deal with time. For example, when it becomes clear that the fares being charged on municipal buses are too low to permit those buses to be replaced as they wear out, the logical economic conclusion for the long run is to raise the fares. However, a politician who opposes the fare increase as "unjustified" may gain the votes of bus riders at the next election. Moreover, since all the buses are not going to wear out immediately, or even simultaneously at some future date, the consequences of holding down the fare will not appear all at once but will be spread out over time. It may be some years before enough buses start breaking down and wearing out, without adequate replacements, for the bus riders to notice that there now seem to be longer waits between buses and buses do not arrive on schedule as often as they used to.

 

4번 지문(문항 번호 32번)

Of all the design disciplines it is probably architecture that has the richest, most diverse tradition for exploring ideas. From paper architecture to visionary design, its long history is full of exciting and inspiring examples. There is a tension between visionary architecture, which has an outward facing social or critical agenda, and paper architecture, which, though often introspective and concerned only with architectural theory, is rarely intended to ever be built. One of the most interesting examples to cross over from idea to reality is Peter Eisenman's famous House VI, which prioritized formalist concerns over practicalities to an extreme extent. The client later wrote about the many practical problems it had but still loved living in such a conceptual building. The relationship between reality and unreality is particularly interesting in architecture because many buildings are designed to be built but remain on paper due to economic or political reasons. House VI is unusual because it was intentionally an uncompromising piece of architectural art someone could nearly live in. It was as though the owner lived inside an idea rather than a building.

 

5번 지문(문항 번호 33번)

In some cases, behavior and expectations can come to be aligned through mutual self-interest. For example, in the early days of motor vehicles, norms emerged in which everyone came to expect everyone else to drive on the right (or left) side of the road. Whether drivers arrived at the collective choice to drive on the right or the left mattered little, so different norms emerged in different parts of the world. The key was to coordinate around some norm in each area and not to deviate. In the case of driving, deviations from the expected behavior are extremely costly, likely resulting in injury or death, so there are strong incentives to adopt a norm and follow it, making it self-enforcing. For early drivers, empirical expectations about what other people would do played a crucial causal role in deciding which side of the road to drive on. At the same time, those expectations were themselves a product of the behavior that other individuals had chosen. Hence causality flowed in both directions.

 

6번 지문(문항 번호 34번)

Predator-prey interactions must eventually end in death: one becomes dinner or the other starves. In contrast, competition between members of the same species usually involves elaborate signaling that is intended to clarify which individual is stronger before conflict escalates to the point of injury. It is in neither the winning nor the losing party's interest to fight over resources, as even winners get hurt in fights. Consequently, it is in both parties' interests to determine who would win if the fight were to take place, with this determination followed immediately by deference or flight by the party destined to lose. Only when competitors appear to be equally matched does a conflict over resources escalate into actual physical combat. For this reason, competition among members of the same species rarely relies on actual force, as the threat of force is an obstacle to conflict. Human conflicts are guided by the same principles as those of other animals, but the fact that warfare is so common testifies to the frequency with which the two sides are unable to agree on who would win a fight.