수프림 유형독해 Ch5 구문 [32,33,34] 변형문제

 

수프림 유형독해

Ch5 구문 [32,33,34]

변형문제

---

 

수프림 유형독해 Ch5 구문 변형문제

 

 

수프림 유형독해 Ch5 구문 변형문제

 

 

전문항 보러가기!

https://themakings.co.kr/247/?idx=1382

수프림 구문독해 CH 5 구문 32-34 (44문항) (PDF)

 

 

---

 

다음 지문을 읽고 글의 내용과 다른 것을 고르세요.

Asteroids are large rocks moving through the solar system. Some are just one meter in diameter, but others are so large that they are considered minor planets. There are millions of asteroids, and many pass by close to Earth. What would be the effects of a large one colliding with Earth? This is the question NASA is trying to answer. They are hosting conferences and holding exercises to simulate the effects of a major asteroid impact. Thankfully, they estimate the chances of this happening soon to be extremely low. However, it could cause widespread devastation. One such catastrophic asteroid strike happened 65 million years ago. It is believed that it caused so much moisture and dust to enter the atmosphere that much of the sun’s light was blocked, lowering temperatures worldwide and causing the extinction of the dinosaurs. Had this not occurred, dinosaurs wouldn’t have gone extinct.

 

① Asteroids range in size from one meter in diameter to objects large enough to be considered minor planets.

② NASA is conducting exercises and hosting conferences to study the potential effects of asteroid impacts.

③ Scientists estimate that the probability of a major asteroid impact occurring soon is very low.

④ The catastrophic asteroid strike 65 million years ago blocked sunlight and lowered global temperatures.

⑤ Even without the asteroid strike, dinosaurs would have eventually gone extinct due to natural causes.

---

이 글은 소행성(asteroid)의 특성과 지구 충돌 시 영향, 그리고 6500만 년 전 실제 충돌 사례를 다루고 있어요. 소행성은 태양계를 이동하는 거대한 암석으로, 크기가 지름 1미터짜리부터 왜소행성(minor planet)으로 분류될 만큼 큰 것까지 다양해요. 수백만 개가 존재하고 많은 수가 지구 근처를 지나갑니다. NASA는 대형 소행성이 충돌할 경우의 영향을 시뮬레이션하는 컨퍼런스와 훈련을 진행 중이에요 — 다행히 가까운 시일 내 충돌 가능성은 극히 낮다고 추정하지만, 실제로 일어난다면 광범위한 피해를 초래할 수 있습니다. 실제 사례로 6500만 년 전 충돌이 언급돼요. 그 충돌로 엄청난 양의 수분과 먼지가 대기로 유입되어 햇빛이 차단되고 전 세계 기온이 하강했으며, 결국 공룡의 멸종을 야기했다고 알려져 있습니다. 그리고 글의 마지막 문장이 오늘 문제의 핵심 포인트예요:

"Had this not occurred, dinosaurs wouldn't have gone extinct."

(이 충돌이 일어나지 않았다면, 공룡은 멸종하지 않았을 것이다)

 

 

이 가정법 문장이 ⑤번 함정의 직접적인 근거입니다.

---

선택지 O/X 분석

 

번호	선택지 요약	원문 대조	판정
①	소행성은 지름 1미터부터 왜소행성으로 분류될 만큼 큰 것까지 다양한 크기를 가짐	"Some are just one meter in diameter, but others are so large that they are considered minor planets"	⭕ 일치
②	NASA는 소행성 충돌의 잠재적 영향을 연구하기 위해 훈련과 컨퍼런스를 진행 중	"hosting conferences and holding exercises to simulate the effects of a major asteroid impact"	⭕ 일치
③	과학자들은 대형 소행성 충돌이 곧 일어날 가능성이 매우 낮다고 추정함	"they estimate the chances of this happening soon to be extremely low"	⭕ 일치
④	6500만 년 전 충돌은 햇빛을 차단하고 전 세계 기온을 낮췄음	"much of the sun's light was blocked, lowering temperatures worldwide"	⭕ 일치
⑤	소행성 충돌이 없었더라도 공룡은 자연적 원인으로 결국 멸종했을 것	"Had this not occurred, dinosaurs wouldn't have gone extinct" — 충돌이 없었다면 멸종하지 않았을 것이라고 명시	❌ 불일치

 

---

정답은 ⑤ — 함정 패턴: 가정법 반대 해석(counterfactual reversal)

이 문제의 함정은 가정법 문장의 의미를 정반대로 해석하도록 유도하는 패턴이에요.

원문 마지막 문장을 다시 볼게요:

"Had this not occurred, dinosaurs wouldn't have gone extinct."

 

이건 가정법 과거완료 문장이에요. 풀어쓰면:

"If this (= the asteroid strike) had not occurred, dinosaurs would not have gone extinct."

(충돌이 없었다면 → 공룡은 멸종하지 않았을 것이다)

 

즉, 원문이 말하는 건 "소행성 충돌이 공룡 멸종의 결정적 원인"이라는 거예요. 충돌만 없었다면 공룡은 살아남았을 것이라는 뜻이죠.

그런데 ⑤번은 이걸 이렇게 바꿔놓았어요:

"Even without the asteroid strike, dinosaurs would have eventually gone extinct due to natural causes."

(소행성 충돌이 없었더라도, 공룡은 자연적 원인으로 결국 멸종했을 것이다)

 

"wouldn't have gone extinct(멸종하지 않았을 것)" → "would have eventually gone extinct(결국 멸종했을 것)"

가정법의 결론이 완전히 뒤집혔어요. 게다가 지문에 전혀 없는 "natural causes(자연적 원인)"까지 끼워 넣어 그럴듯하게 포장했습니다.

함정 유형 정리: 가정법 역전(counterfactual reversal)

원문에 "If A had not happened, B would not have occurred" 형태의 가정법이 나오면, 선택지에서 "Even without A, B would have happened anyway" 식으로 결론을 뒤집는 패턴이에요. 가정법은 구조가 복잡해서 빠르게 읽으면 방향을 놓치기 쉬우니, not의 위치를 특히 주의 깊게 확인하세요.

 

---

핵심 어휘 정리

• asteroid — 소행성
• diameter — 지름
• minor planet — 왜소행성
• simulate — 시뮬레이션하다, 모의 실험하다
• devastation — 대규모 파괴, 참화
• catastrophic — 대재앙적인
• moisture — 수분, 습기
• extinction — 멸종
• Had this not occurred — 이것이 일어나지 않았더라면 (가정법 과거완료 도치)
• natural causes — 자연적 원인 (선택지의 함정 표현, 원문에 없음)

---

풀이 전략 팁

가정법 문장은 수능 불일치 문제에서 특히 자주 함정으로 쓰이는 구문이에요. 이유는 두 가지예요:

 

첫째, 구조가 복잡해서 빠르게 읽으면 not의 위치를 놓치기 쉬워요. "wouldn't have gone extinct"와 "would have gone extinct"는 딱 한 단어(not) 차이지만 의미는 정반대거든요.

둘째, 이번처럼 도치(inversion) 형태로 쓰이면 더 헷갈려요. "Had this not occurred"는 "If this had not occurred"의 도치형인데, 시험장에서 긴장한 상태에서 읽으면 not을 흘려보내기 쉽습니다.

가정법 문장이 나오면 반드시 이 두 가지를 체크하세요:

• 조건절의 not: "had not occurred" — 충돌이 없었다면
• 결과절의 not: "wouldn't have gone extinct" — 멸종하지 않았을 것

둘 다 부정이니, 결론은 "충돌 없음 → 멸종 없음"이에요. 선택지가 이 결론을 긍정으로 바꿔놓았다면 바로 정답입니다.

---

The Makings의 2025년 수프림 구문독해 CH 5 구문 32-34 변형 문제는

총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다.

 

1. 빈칸 채우기(객관식)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 문단 재배열 하기(객관식)

 

---

 

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한

수프림 구문독해 CH 5 구문 32-34 변형 문제의 지문입니다.

 

1번 지문

Britney pulled up in front of my house, and I got into the passenger seat. We had a long drive ahead of us, so I settled into my seat and looked out the window. There was absolutely nothing to see ─ just empty field after empty field. After about 20 minutes, we came to the highway, and Britney hit the accelerator as if she were a race car driver trying to pass the competition. After a few minutes I realized the highway was covered in a layer of invisible ice. Britney was still driving much too fast, and before I could warn her, the car began to slide to the left. Britney immediately slammed on the brakes, which only made things worse. She was screaming at this point, having completely lost control of the car, which began to spin as it flew down the highway at nearly 120 kilometers per hour. There was nothing either of us could do.

 

2번 지문

If humans had never existed, most of the world would resemble the Serengeti. Lions would live in North America, and elephants would walk through Europe. As part of a study, researchers analyzed what the distribution of mammal species would look like if it were not for the impact of humans. A previous study suggested the spread of humans, not climate change, was the cause of the mass extinctions during the last ice age. In their new analysis, the researchers concluded that sub-Saharan Africa is virtually the only place on Earth with a high diversity and sizeable populations of large mammals. The reason is not because the environment there is particularly favorable; it is due to the fact that human activities are limited and have not yet wiped out most mammal species. Large parts of the world would be home to large mammals if it were not for human-driven range losses and extinctions.

 

3번 지문

Asteroids are large rocks moving through the solar system. Some are just one meter in diameter, but others are so large that they are considered minor planets. There are millions of asteroids, and many pass by close to Earth. What would be the effects of a large one colliding with Earth? This is the question NASA is trying to answer. They are hosting conferences and holding exercises to simulate the effects of a major asteroid impact. Thankfully, they estimate the chances of this happening soon to be extremely low. However, it could cause widespread devastation. One such catastrophic asteroid strike happened 65 million years ago. It is believed that it caused so much moisture and dust to enter the atmosphere that much of the sun’s light was blocked, lowering temperatures worldwide and causing the extinction of the dinosaurs. Had this not occurred, dinosaurs wouldn’t have gone extinct.

 

4번 지문

What would a language be like if it didn't make any simplifications or generalizations? It would be a language in which every word was a proper noun. Because you don't want to gloss over the differences between snakes that are slightly different in some respect, every snake must have its own name. Furthermore, every event must have its own verb, because not every occasion of thinking or dancing or talking is identical. There might be some superintelligent race of beings that could know such a language, but they would have to know virtually everything in the world to learn all these names. Human language has taken a different route ─ many fewer names, with a loss of precision, but a basic vocabulary that is readily acquired. However, this fact is not simply a compromise with our limited cognitive capacity. By using the same word for different objects, we're communicating information about those things. Calling two different-looking things "spider" communicates that they probably have eight legs, weave nests, eat insects, and other noticeable details, which we would not know if we gave them all their own separate names.