N기출 영어영역 고난도 독해 Level 1 Part 1. 1 함축 의미 추론 변형문제

N기출 영어영역 고난도 독해 Level 1

Part 1. 1 함축 의미 추론 변형문제

 

N기출 영어영역 고난도 독해 Level 1 변형문제

 

 

N기출 영어영역 고난도 독해 Level 1 Part 1. 1 함축 의미 추론 변형문제

 

https://themakings.co.kr/407/?idx=1462

최상위 수능 기출문제집 N기출 영어영역 고난도 독해 Level 1 Part 1 - 1. 함축 의미 추론(PDF)

 

 

---

지문 해석

군 복무 중, 나는 내 행동을 인도하기 위해 이 격언에 크게 의존했다. 어려운 결정을 내려야 할 때마다, 나는 스스로에게 "긴 녹색 테이블 앞에 설 수 있겠는가?"라고 물었다. 제2차 세계대전 이래로, 군 회의실에서 사용되는 회의 테이블은 녹색 펠트로 덮인 길고 좁은 가구로 만들어져 왔다. 여러 장교가 문제를 판결해야 하는 공식적인 절차가 있을 때마다, 장교들은 테이블 주위에 모였다. 그 격언의 요점은 간단했다. 긴 녹색 테이블 주위에 앉은 장교들에게 좋은 논거를 제시할 수 없다면, 행동을 재고해야 한다. 중요한 결정을 내리려 할 때마다 나는 스스로에게 물었다. "긴 녹색 테이블 앞에 서서 모든 올바른 조치를 취했다고 만족할 수 있는가?" 이것은 리더가 스스로에게 해야 할 가장 근본적인 질문 중 하나이며 — 그 오래된 격언은 내가 어떤 조치를 취해야 할지 기억하는 데 도움을 주었다.

 

---

 

 

다음 지문을 읽고 글에 내용과 다른 문장을 고르세요.

 

Serving in the military, I relied heavily on this saying to guide my actions. Whenever I had a difficult decision to make, I would ask myself, "Can you stand before the long green table?" Since WWII, the conference tables used in military boardrooms had been constructed of long, narrow pieces of furniture covered in green felt. Whenever a formal proceeding took place that required multiple officers to adjudicate an issue, the officers would gather around the table. The point of the saying was simple. If you couldn't make a good case to the officers sitting around the long green table, then you should reconsider your actions. Every time I was about to make an important decision, I asked myself, "Can I stand before the long green table and be satisfied that I took all the right actions?" It is one of the most fundamental questions a leader must ask themselves ― and the old saying helped me remember what steps to take.

 

① The author used a saying as a standard of judgment during military service.

② The long green table refers to the conference tables used in military boardrooms since WWII.

③ The tables were round pieces of furniture covered in green felt.

④ Officers gathered around the table to adjudicate issues in formal proceedings.

⑤ The old saying helped the author determine what steps to take in important decisions.

---

풀이 흐름

이 지문은 군 복무 경험에서 얻은 의사결정 격언에 대한 개인적 서사다. 전체 구조가 직관적이고, 대부분의 선지가 지문 내용을 그대로 옮겨 놓았기 때문에, 사소한 형용사 하나의 변형을 잡아내는 것이 핵심이다. 특히 테이블의 물리적 묘사가 등장하는 세 번째 문장이 출제 포인트다. 지문에서 "long, narrow pieces of furniture"라고 명시한 부분을 선지에서 어떤 단어로 바꿨는지를 확인하면 즉시 답이 보인다.

---

전체 선지 분석

선지	판정	근거
① The author used a saying as a standard of judgment during military service.	✅ 일치	"I relied heavily on this saying to guide my actions"에서 격언을 판단 기준으로 삼았음이 확인됨
② The long green table refers to the conference tables used in military boardrooms since WWII.	✅ 일치	"Since WWII, the conference tables used in military boardrooms"와 정확히 대응
③ The tables were round pieces of furniture covered in green felt.	❌ 불일치	원문은 "long, narrow pieces of furniture covered in green felt"이다. **round(둥근)**는 **long, narrow(길고 좁은)**와 정반대 형태.
④ Officers gathered around the table to adjudicate issues in formal proceedings.	✅ 일치	"a formal proceeding took place that required multiple officers to adjudicate an issue, the officers would gather around the table"과 대응
⑤ The old saying helped the author determine what steps to take in important decisions.	✅ 일치	"the old saying helped me remember what steps to take"와 대응

 

---

핵심 구문 정리

"long, narrow pieces of furniture covered in green felt" 길고 좁은 가구에 녹색 펠트를 덮은 것 → ③번의 "round"는 이 묘사와 완전히 다른 형태

 

"Can I stand before the long green table and be satisfied that I took all the right actions?" 이 자기 점검 질문이 격언의 핵심 → 리더의 의사결정 기준으로 기능

 

---

한 줄 요약

 

테이블의 형태는 "long, narrow(길고 좁은)"이지 "round(둥근)"가 아니다. ③번은 형용사 하나를 바꿔치기한 전형적인 세부사항 변형 문제다.

 

---

The Makings의 Part 1 - 1. 함축 의미 추론  변형문제는

총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다.

 

1. 빈칸 채우기(객관식)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 문단 재배열 하기(객관식)

 

---

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한

최상위 수능 기출문제집 N기출 영어영역 고난도 독해 Level 1

Part 1 - 1. 함축 의미 추론(55문항) 변형문제의 지문입니다.

 

1번 지문

When we see something, we naturally and automatically break it up into shapes, colors, and concepts that we have learned through education. We recode what we see through the lens of everything we know. We reconstruct memories rather than retrieving the video from memory. This is a useful trait. It’s a more efficient way to store information ―a bit like an optimal image compression algorithm such as JPG, rather than storing a raw bitmap image file. People who lack this ability and remember everything in perfect detail struggle to generalize, learn, and make connections between what they have learned. But representing the world as abstract ideas and features comes at a cost of seeing the world as it is. Instead, we see the world through our assumptions, motivations, and past experiences. The discovery that our memories are reconstructed through abstract representations rather than played back like a movie completely undermined the legal primacy of eyewitness testimony. Seeing is not believing.

 

2번 지문

Nothing is trash by nature. Anthropologist Mary Douglas brings back and analyzes the common saying that dirt is "matter out of place." Dirt is relative, she emphasizes. "Shoes are not dirty in themselves, but it is dirty to place them on the dining-table; food is not dirty in itself, but it is dirty to leave pots and pans in the bedroom, or food all over clothing; similarly, bathroom items in the living room; clothing lying on chairs; outdoor things placed indoors; upstairs things downstairs, and so on." Sorting the dirty from the clean ― removing the shoes from the table, putting the dirty clothing in the washing machine ― involves systematic ordering and classifying. Eliminating dirt is thus a positive process.

 

3번 지문

Serving in the military, I relied heavily on this saying to guide my actions. Whenever I had a difficult decision to make, I would ask myself, "Can you stand before the long green table?" Since WWII, the conference tables used in military boardrooms had been constructed of long, narrow pieces of furniture covered in green felt. Whenever a formal proceeding took place that required multiple officers to adjudicate an issue, the officers would gather around the table. The point of the saying was simple. If you couldn't make a good case to the officers sitting around the long green table, then you should reconsider your actions. Every time I was about to make an important decision, I asked myself, "Can I stand before the long green table and be satisfied that I took all the right actions?" It is one of the most fundamental questions a leader must ask themselves ― and the old saying helped me remember what steps to take.

 

4번 지문

We can no longer afford to see law as a series of dry and dusty legal codes that, in the face of evolving technology, are already outdated by the time the laws are printed. That vision of law is just going to have to go. We must learn to see the discipline of law as a method for adapting to technological change, not a series of presently existing rules. We must attend to change in law, rather than its present state. It's like driving a car: many people look at the speedometer to see how fast they are going. That's looking at the law as it is now. But we need to be looking at how fast we are accelerating. That's a different way to look at law, and one that is necessary if law is to keep pace with technology.

 

5번 지문

The world economy is not completely free. There are limits to international trade. In the large majority of developing countries, the government heavily supports businesses by, for example, having state-owned banks lend them money at extremely low interest rates. Such government support has alarmed the United States and other rich countries. They fear that given the huge number of developing countries with government-subsidized companies, the rich countries will be flooded with extremely cheap imports, which will bankrupt many of their own companies and cause a wide-spread loss of jobs. Rich countries have therefore demanded "a level playing field," pressuring this group of developing countries to abandon government support if they want to join the international trading system. Of course, complying with this demand will effectively destroy these countries' hope of becoming prosperous.