2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철)5과 변형 문제 Better Together

 

2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철)

5과 변형 문제

Better Together

---

2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철) 5과 변형 문제 Better Together

 

  일반 워크북 형태의 문제에서 벗어나 The Makings가 만든

2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철) 5과 변형 문제는

출판사에서 오랫동안 영어 번역과 교정을 하셨던 원어민 선생님과

현직에서 강사를 하고 있는 연구진들이 학생들을 위한

최상의 2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철) 5과 변형 문제를 선보입니다.

사고력과 이해력을 요구하는 문제들로 내신 대비 뿐만이 아니라

수능도 한꺼번에 공부하실 수 있는 자료입니다.

중간고사&기말고사 전에 더메이킹스(The Makings)에서 제작한

2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철) 5과 변형 문제로 마무리 하세요.

 

정답 확인하러가기!

https://themakings.co.kr/53/?idx=973

2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철) 5과 최종 모의고사 Better Together

 

 

themakings.co.kr

 

The Makings의 2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철) 5과 변형 문제는

총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다.

 

1. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 전체 내용과 어울리지 않는 문장 찾기(객관식/영어선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 글 다시 쓰기

 

---

 

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한

2015년 개정 영어 II 금성(최인철) 5과 변형 문제의 지문입니다.

 

1번 지문

Imagine there are two groups of people. In Group A, there are people with higher IQ scores, while the people in Group B have lower IQ scores. Each group is asked to solve some problems together within the group. Between the two groups, which one do you think will solve problems more quickly and accurately? You may predict that Group A will do better since the members of this group scored higher on the IQ tests. Surprisingly, however, Group B outperforms Group A. It turns out that Group A spends too much time debating instead of focusing on the task itself. The members assert their well-reasoned points of view while pointing out flaws in other members' logic. These individuals are very quick at finding potential problems and shutting down ideas. This fault-finding type of conversation causes unnecessary tension and competition and eventually hinders the team's effectiveness. What does this tell us? We easily assume that individuals with the highest capability invariably make perfect team members. However, many studies have shown that we should not be misled by individual intelligence. In fact, the key to making an ideal team is communication.

 

2번 지문

Title: Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups

Purpose: to find out what makes a group more competent than others

Procedure: 1. Measure 699 people's individual intelligence.

2. Randomly assign the participants to groups.

3. Ask them to work in groups to complete tasks. (e.g., puzzles, brainstorming, making moral judgements)

The results of the research showed that there are certain factors that differentiated groups with high group intelligence from those with low group intelligence. Most importantly, these factors enabled effective communication, creating a motivating atmosphere. First, teams with higher group intelligence demonstrated a more equal distribution of conversational turn-taking. In other words, in these groups certain individuals did not dominate conversations and everyone contributed equally to the discussion. Second, members of these groups scored well on a test called "Reading the Mind," which measures how well people can read complex emotional states from people's faces. These people were socially sensitive enough to sense people's feelings during a discussion. This discovery led to the conclusion that when groups of such socially sensitive people worked together and were given equal opportunities to contribute, team members were more motivated to freely exchange ideas and appreciate other opinions, which guaranteed the team's success.

 

3번 지문

What boosts the impact of communication on a group's achievement is interdisciplinarity, or how diverse the group members are. Interdisciplinary groups are groups whose members specialize in a variety of fields of study. These groups tend to accomplish more than a group of just scientists or a group of only artists by mixing the best of the various fields. Steve Jobs was very well aware of the importance of communication among experts from various fields. He believed that the best work is created when people from different fields are connected together and when people with different backgrounds and knowledge encourage each other to think out of the box. He claimed that without such interaction, success would be very difficult to achieve. This very philosophy was reflected in the design of his animation studio. The original architectural plan called for three buildings, with separate offices for the computer scientists, the animators, and the CEOs. However, in order to encourage interaction among the employees, Jobs insisted that a single building be constructed with an airy space at its center. The purpose of creating this empty hall was to force the computer programmers and animators to collaborate and exchange ideas freely. That emphasis on communication, even though it came at the expense of convenience, was met with an unbelievable result: every one of the studio's animations has been a commercial success, with an average international profit of more than $550 million per animation from 1995 to 2011.

 

4번 지문

Communication among people with various backgrounds is especially necessary in the digital era, where it is almost impossible to be knowledgeable in more than one field due to the rapid expansion and changes in each field. When individuals' interdisciplinary knowledge is collected together, it becomes much more powerful than an encyclopedia written by a handful of experts. When such intelligence is brought together, it is called "collective intelligence." Although it has long been around us in many different forms, the Internet has created a new form of collective intelligence. Thanks to the Internet, knowledge and opinions have become very easy to share nowadays. People post what they know or how they feel about certain things on open pages, and not only can others look at these posts but they can also leave comments on them. Such active online communication of opinions and knowledge can sometimes be more accurate and meaningful than the opinion of one single expert. To sum up, many people mistakenly believe that highly capable individuals automatically make ideal group members. However, a number of studies have demonstrated that this is not necessarily true. What determines a group's success is communication rather than individual intelligence. When people care about other people's feelings and make sure that everyone participates evenly, their interaction is bound to produce a good result. Furthermore, connections between people with various kinds of knowledge ensure creative innovation and an unimaginable range of information. We always need geniuses. And we do benefit from experts working together. However, we should be aware that a group of average people with diverse backgrounds who are willing to communicate is as important as, if not more than, the superstars.