수능실감 영어 독해 10문항 모의고사 500제 2회 변형문제

 

수능실감 영어 독해 10문항 모의고사 500제 2회 변형문제

수능실감 영어 독해 10문항 모의고사 500제 2회 변형문제

수능실감 영어 독해 10문항 모의고사 500제 2회 변형문제

 

전문항 확인 하러가기!

https://themakings.co.kr/422/?idx=1556

수능실감 영어 독해 10문항 모의고사 500제 2회(PDF)

 

 

---

 

다음 지문을 읽고 글의 내용과 다른 문장을 고르세요.

 

Socrates said, "dura lex, sed lex," which means the law is harsh, but it is the law. However, obeying the law is not always the right thing to do. In history, there have been many people who refused to follow unjust laws. Two remarkable examples are Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King. Both of these men believed that the laws of their time were not fair. Mahatma Gandhi was against the British rule of India; he believed that Indians should control their own country. Martin Luther King was against the laws that discriminated against black people in the United States. Both of these men broke the law because they wanted to change the system they felt was wrong. Consequently, they made big differences in the history of human rights.

 

① The Latin phrase cited by Socrates conveys that even harsh laws must be acknowledged as laws.

② History records numerous individuals who chose to defy laws they considered unjust.

③ Gandhi and King are cited as notable figures who opposed the legal systems of their respective eras.

④ King fought against racial discrimination embedded in the legal framework of the United States.

⑤ Their acts of breaking the law ultimately led to stricter legal restrictions on civil movements.

---

지문 해석

소크라테스는 "dura lex, sed lex"라고 말했는데, 이는 법은 가혹하지만 그래도 법이라는 뜻이다. 그러나 법을 따르는 것이 항상 옳은 일은 아니다. 역사적으로 부당한 법을 따르기를 거부한 사람들이 많았다. 두 가지 주목할 만한 사례는 마하트마 간디와 마틴 루터 킹이다. 이 두 사람 모두 자기 시대의 법이 공정하지 않다고 믿었다. 마하트마 간디는 영국의 인도 통치에 반대했으며, 인도인들이 자기 나라를 스스로 통치해야 한다고 믿었다. 마틴 루터 킹은 미국에서 흑인을 차별하는 법에 반대했다. 이 두 사람 모두 자신들이 잘못되었다고 느끼는 체제를 바꾸고 싶어서 법을 어겼다. 결과적으로, 그들은 인권의 역사에 큰 변화를 만들어냈다.

 

---

풀이 흐름

이 지문의 핵심 논지는 "부당한 법에 저항한 사람들이 인권 역사에 긍정적 변화를 이끌어냈다"는 것이다. 간디와 킹을 그 대표적 사례로 제시하며, 그들의 법 위반 행위가 가져온 결과를 마지막 문장에서 분명히 밝힌다.

지문은 "they made big differences in the history of human rights"라고 서술한다. 이는 그들의 행동이 인권 신장에 긍정적으로 기여했다는 의미이다.

따라서 그들의 법 위반 행위가 "시민 운동에 대한 더 엄격한 법적 제한(stricter legal restrictions on civil movements)"으로 이어졌다고 서술하는 선지가 있다면, 이는 지문이 전달하는 긍정적 결과와 정면으로 모순된다.

 

---

전체 선지 분석

 

선지	판정	근거
① The Latin phrase cited by Socrates conveys that even harsh laws must be acknowledged as laws.	✅ 일치	지문의 "the law is harsh, but it is the law"와 직접 대응. acknowledged as laws = it is the law.
② History records numerous individuals who chose to defy laws they considered unjust.	✅ 일치	지문의 "there have been many people who refused to follow unjust laws"와 정확히 대응. defy = refused to follow, numerous = many.
③ Gandhi and King are cited as notable figures who opposed the legal systems of their respective eras.	✅ 일치	지문의 "Two remarkable examples are Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King. Both of these men believed that the laws of their time were not fair"와 일치. notable = remarkable, respective eras = their time.
④ King fought against racial discrimination embedded in the legal framework of the United States.	✅ 일치	지문의 "Martin Luther King was against the laws that discriminated against black people in the United States"와 직접 대응. racial discrimination embedded in the legal framework = laws that discriminated.
⑤ Their acts of breaking the law ultimately led to stricter legal restrictions on civil movements.	❌ 불일치	지문은 "they made big differences in the history of human rights"라고 명시. stricter legal restrictions on civil movements ↔ big differences in the history of human rights로 결과의 방향이 정반대. 인권 역사에 긍정적 변화를 이끌어낸 것이지, 시민 운동에 대한 제약을 강화한 것이 아니다.

 

---

핵심 문장 정리

"Consequently, they made big differences in the history of human rights."

이 문장이 ⑤번 선지의 오류를 판별하는 결정적 근거다. 지문은 간디와 킹의 법 위반 행위가 "인권 역사에 큰 변화(big differences)"를 만들어냈다고 긍정적으로 서술하는 반면, ⑤번은 그 결과가 시민 운동에 대한 "더 엄격한 법적 제한(stricter legal restrictions)"이었다고 부정적으로 서술했다.

---

한 줄 정리

간디와 킹의 법 위반은 시민 운동에 대한 "더 엄격한 법적 제한"을 초래한 것이 아니라 "인권 역사에 큰 긍정적 변화"를 이끌어냈다.

 

---

The Makings의 수능실감 영어 독해 10문항 모의고사 500제 2회 변형문제는

총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다.

 

1. 빈칸 채우기(객관식)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 문단 재배열 하기(객관식)

---

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한 수능실감 영어 독해 10문항 모의고사 500제의

2회(110문항) 변형문제의 지문입니다.

 

1번 지문

Socrates said, "dura lex, sed lex," which means the law is harsh, but it is the law. However, obeying the law is not always the right thing to do. In history, there have been many people who refused to follow unjust laws. Two remarkable examples are Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King. Both of these men believed that the laws of their time were not fair. Mahatma Gandhi was against the British rule of India; he believed that Indians should control their own country. Martin Luther King was against the laws that discriminated against black people in the United States. Both of these men broke the law because they wanted to change the system they felt was wrong. Consequently, they made big differences in the history of human rights.

 

2번 지문

It is commonly argued that the very act of memorizing can ensure a more complete knowledge of and intimate connection with the music. Furthermore, memorization can enable use of direct eye contact with an audience (and gaze, in other ways, for expressive purposes) that is more convincing than when referring to the score. Those who "possess" the music in this way often convey the impression that they are spontaneously and sincerely communicating from the heart, and indeed, contemporary evidence suggests that musicians who achieve this are better able to engage their audiences. Moreover, when performers receive and react to visual feedback from the audience, a performance can become truly interactive, involving true communication between all involved.

 

3번 지문

Clearly, danced rituals did not seem like a waste of energy to prehistoric peoples. They took the time to fashion masks and costumes; they joyfully burned calories in the execution of the dance; they preferred to record these scenes over any other group activity. Thus anthropologist Victor Turner's attribution of danced ritual to an occasional, marginal, or liminal status seems especially unjustified in the prehistoric case ─ and more representative of the production-oriented mentality of our own industrial age than of prehistoric priorities. Surely these people knew hardship and were often threatened by food shortages, disease, and wild animals. But ritual, of a danced and possibly ecstatic nature, was central to their lives. Perhaps only because our own lives, so much easier in many ways, are also so constrained by the modern imperative to work, we have to wonder why.

 

4번 지문

According to popular wisdom, work is a burden people must endure out of necessity, even as they long for weekends and holidays. Yet when Americans were asked in the early 1980s whether they would retire from work if they could, about 80 percent said they would not. In fact, human beings are programmed twice to be dependent on being productive: once by the genes and then by the pressure of social expectations. Already in the first year of life, infants display joy in causing events, as when turning on a tap or playing with a ball. Children in a reasonably stimulating and structured environment learn to enjoy concentrated effort. Indeed, our species would not have survived if most of us had not developed a taste for work. And, of course, human communities reinforce this tendency by shaming and turning away from those who do not contribute to the common good.

 

5번 지문

What we want to do is to cooperate with people who we believe would cooperate with us. People who cooperated with us in a previous interaction are likely to do it the next time. So it would be very helpful if we've already had some interaction with people we meet, so we can recognize them as probable cooperators or defectors. In a small town, people tend to interact with the same people again and again, and to recognize who can be counted on to cooperate and who can't. That's why people in small towns tend to be nicer. But in larger cities, we interact with lots of people we have never interacted with before, so we can't tell whether they're cooperators or defectors. Maybe it's too great of a risk to cooperate with someone who might defect on you. That's why there's more nastiness in larger cities.

 

6번 지문

Tourism is an important mediator in the development of fusion cuisine, because the mixing of different culinary traditions is often stimulated by people who travel to produce or consume food. This process of mobile food appreciation has been going on for centuries, as has been shown in the analysis of the development of the historical food trade that linked different countries. However, the development of fusion foods can hinder the development of native-cuisine experiences. Tourists very often demand food which is "traditional" or "authentic," and yet many tourists are also averse to trying new and unfamiliar foods. One impulse for the development of fusion cuisine in Asia has been the desire to produce food which is more familiar and therefore appetizing to foreign visitors. The flip side is that "rootless" cuisine may also come to be seen as "inauthentic" by visitors searching for unique and original culinary experiences.

 

7번 지문

A plant-based diet lets the Earth breathe easier. The cultivation of crops for direct human consumption is far more efficient than using grains or beans to raise farm animals. Only a small fraction of the nutrients that cattle or other animals take in are left in their muscles. The rest are used up to power their movements, metabolism, body warmth, and other life functions. A few decades ago, Scientific American reported that producing a pound of bacon requires ten times as much crop land (in the form of feed grains) as is needed to produce the same quantity of artificial bacon from soybeans. The cultivation of those feed crops requires land, water, and pesticides and other chemicals that worsen our environmental problems.

 

8번 지문

The impacts of tourism on the environment are evident to scientists, but not all residents attribute environmental damage to tourism. Residents commonly have positive views on the economic and some sociocultural influences of tourism on quality of life, but their reactions to environmental impacts are mixed. Some residents feel tourism provides more parks and recreation areas, improves the quality of the roads and public facilities, and does not contribute to ecological decline. Many do not blame tourism for traffic problems, overcrowded outdoor recreation, or the disturbance of peace and tranquility of parks. Alternatively, some residents express concern that tourists overcrowd the local fishing, hunting, and other recreation areas or may cause traffic and pedestrian congestion. Some studies suggest that this divide in residents' feelings about tourism's relationship to environmental damage is related to the type of tourism, the extent to which residents feel the natural environment needs to be protected, and the distance residents live from the tourist attractions.

 

9번 지문

Do children do better at school if reinforced by gold stars, prizes or even monetary rewards? Reinforcement theory says that giving rewards leads to repetition of the behavior rewarded and punishment reduces repetition. Given that most children love candy, reinforcement theory says that if you give candy to a child who has sat quietly in his or her chair for five minutes, that child will quickly learn to sit quietly all the time. Against the major principles of reinforcement, some behavioral scientists argue that the more you reinforce a person for doing a certain thing, the faster that person will lose interest in the very thing that they are being rewarded for. That is, getting a reward reduces the fun of the activity. Some studies have shown that if you reward children for sensible behavior, they tend to see the behavior as a "special-occasion" thing rather than something to make a habit of. Therefore they are less likely to change in the long term than those not rewarded.

 

10번 지문

Occasionally, governments explicitly discriminate against foreign companies in favor of domestic companies. For instance, in 2005 the government of Argentina (successfully) stimulated consumers to boycott Shell after the company had raised the oil price. In many countries, more subtle 'buy national' campaigns are still implemented in which consuming products from home companies is favored over 'foreign' products. However, with the increasing foreign content of domestic products, and increasingly ambiguous ownership structures of leading companies, the distinction between 'foreign' and 'domestic' has become increasingly challenged. In addition, national and local host governments have good reasons to attract (or retain) large foreign multinational enterprises. International companies affect the macro-economic policies of individual countries particularly through their (potentially) positive impact on trade and investment flows, competition, technology transfer and tax income. In consequence, governments prefer to use incentives rather than sanctions, and non-discrimination principles rather than discriminatory practices in their policies towards multinational enterprises.