2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 4

2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사

변형 문제 Part 4

2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 4

2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 4

 

일반 워크북 형태의 문제에서 벗어나 The Makings가 만든

2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 4

출판사에서 오랫동안 영어 번역과 교정을 하셨던 원어민 선생님과 

현직에서 강사를 하고 있는 연구진들이 학생들을 위한 최상의 2025년 고3

5월 전국 연합 모의고사  변형 문제 Part 4 를 선보입니다. 

사고력과 이해력을 요구하는 문제들로 내신 대비 뿐만이 아니라

수능도 한꺼번에 공부하실 수 있는 자료입니다.

중간고사&기말고사 전에 더메이킹스(The Makings)에서 제작한

2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제로 마무리 하세요. 

 

정답 확인 하러가기!

https://themakings.co.kr/245/?idx=1245

2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 4 (66문항) (PDF)

 

 

 

The Makings의 2025년 고3 5월 전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제는

총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다. 

 

1. 빈칸 채우기(객관식)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 문단 재배열 하기(객관식)

 

---

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한  2025년 고3 5월

전국 연합 모의고사 변형 문제 Part 4의 지문입니다. 

 

1번 지문(문항 번호 35번)

Almost all life shows a 24-hour pattern of activity and rest, even bacteria. It seems very likely that this rhythm evolved as a result of living on a planet that rotates once every 24 hours and that the resultant changes in light, temperature and food availability forced an adaptive evolutionary response. Diurnal and nocturnal species have evolved numerous specializations that have allowed them to perform best under the different conditions of light or dark, but, critically, not both. Life seems to have made an evolutionary 'decision' to be active at a specific part of the day/night cycle, and, as a result, those species that are specialized to be active during the day will not be particularly effective at night. In the same way, nocturnal animals that are perfectly adapted to move around and hunt under dim or no light fail miserably during the day. The struggle for existence has forced species to become specialists and not generalists, and no species can operate with the same effectiveness across the 24-hour light/dark environment.

 

2번 지문(문항 번호 36번)

Flowering plants and bees are not strict mutualists. Flowering plants don't want to give up all their precious pollen to undesirable pollinators or even to generally dependable pollinating bees. A small fraction of a flower's pollen grains must make their way to other flowers to ultimately produce seeds and foster new generations of plants. Bees, on the other hand, would like to collect all the pollen and not give any of it up. This difference leads to cheaters in the system. Some nectar-robbing bees cut slits or holes at the bases of tube-shaped flowers and never deposit pollen on stigmas. They are anti-pollinators. Orchids and a few other flowering plants offer no food to bee pollinators. Instead, they deceive male bees into thinking a particular orchid flower is a receptive, ready, and waiting female of their species to make them pollinate. Why not? They produce the same chemical scents and even sort of look like those female bees.

 

3번 지문(문항 번호 37번)

The bond of friendship may solve a problem known as the banker's paradox. When you are facing financial ruin and most need a loan, the bank is unlikely to grant you one as you represent a terrible credit risk. On the other hand, when things are going well the bank is only too happy to offer you funds. This same dynamic would also have posed a deep problem for reciprocal altruism in the world of our ancestors. Individuals may be least likely to receive help when they most need it, because they are least able to reciprocate. Why would a non-relative come to your aid, with a greatly reduced chance of being paid back the favour? The evolution of friendship provides a solution to the dilemma. The oxytocin-mediated bond between friends makes them irreplaceable to each other. So if a friend falls seriously ill, rather than abandoning them to find someone else with whom to engage in reciprocal altruism, you have an emotional stake in their well-being that compels you to help them pull through. Friendship may have developed in human evolution as a form of insurance.

 

4번 지문(문항 번호 38번)

For most of history science was secretive, obscure and often considered indistinguishable from magic. Modern science by contrast combines observation, interpretation and action in forms that collectivize the knowledge gained and institutionalizes them in labs, centres, disciplines, funds and stored memories. As a collective, science polices itself, as happened in 2018 when a Chinese scientist, He Jiankui, announced the birth of twin girls with edited genomes, and was met with a storm of disapproval. This open and collective nature was understood early in the history of modern science. Joseph Glanvill was one of its first theorists, arguing in the 1660s that 'free and ingenious exchange of the reasons of our particular sentiments' is the best method of discovering truth and improving knowledge. Yet this, the increasingly collective nature of science, is often missed in stories of individual genius, whether Newton sitting under an apple tree or Einstein writing at night after his job. But the more we know, the more collective science looks, dependent on networks of collaborators, supporters and colleagues.

 

5번 지문(문항 번호 39번)

Social scientists find it harder to agree than do natural scientists. Researchers at the leading edge of physics, for example, may argue fiercely, but there is sufficient consensus among the discipline's scholars for an introductory physics textbook to state with authority the basic knowledge that is accepted by the field. In contrast, introductory social science texts often describe their subjects as a series of competing perspectives. There are benefits to stressing what divides us. By taking specific emphases to their logical conclusions, we can readily perceive the arguments that need to be resolved if we are to explain this or that aspect of the social world. Like politicians in elections, advocates of particular schools try to put 'clear blue water' between themselves and their rivals. But, like politicians in power, when the same advocates get round to doing sociology (rather than just advertising their brand of it) they tend to fall back to a common middle ground.

 

6번 지문(문항 번호 40번)

In one revealing series of studies, researchers from the Julius-Maximilians University of Wurzburg, Germany, enrolled test subjects in a well-known experiment called "die under the cup." In the experiment, participants make a series of die rolls under a cup, the results of which only they can see, and then report their results anonymously. Participants were told they would earn money depending on the outcome of their rolls, with higher rolls rewarded more favorably. To ensure appropriate conditions, the researchers varied the time participants had to report their results. In the first round, they asked participants to report their results immediately. In the second, they were instructed to do so after a short delay. The results were clear, supporting what many researchers have long suspected: the results reported immediately were more honest than those reported after a delay, suggesting that honesty is a more instinctive response and showing that dishonesty takes greater cognitive effort.