수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제 Day 34 변형문제

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제 Day 34 변형문제

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제

 

전문항 확인 하러가기!

https://themakings.co.kr/421/?idx=1693

 

수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제 DAY 34 변형문제(PDF)

---

 

 

다음 지문을 읽고 글의 내용과 다른 문장을 고르세요.

 

It’s tempting to see a strong dividing line between philosophy and science. After all, science is precise and defined by proven, concrete facts, whereas philosophy goes beyond the facts and into areas of speculation that probably can never be proven. Still, there is considerable overlap. Science may rely on cold, hard facts, but its directions have been determined by philosophy more than by any other area of study. The scientific method itself grew out of philosophical inquiry into the natures of meaning, truth, and knowledge, and these inquiries continue today in the fields of philosophy. At the same time, the philosophy of ethics determines the types of experiments we allow our scientists to carry out. In the end, one may be concerned with observable data and the other with meanings and values, but neither science nor philosophy exists in a vacuum.

 

① Philosophy deals with areas of speculation that may never be definitively proven through experimentation.

② The scientific method developed independently of any philosophical tradition or intellectual influence.

③ There is significant overlap between the domains of science and philosophy despite their apparent differences.

④ Ethical philosophy plays a role in shaping the kinds of experiments that scientists are permitted to conduct.

⑤ Science focuses on observable data while philosophy is more concerned with meanings and values.

---

지문 해석

철학과 과학 사이에 강한 분리선을 보는 것은 매력적이다. 결국, 과학은 정밀하고 입증된 구체적 사실에 의해 정의되는 반면, 철학은 사실을 넘어서 아마도 결코 증명될 수 없는 추측의 영역으로 들어간다. 그럼에도 상당한 중첩(considerable overlap)이 있다. 과학은 냉정하고 확고한 사실에 의존할 수 있지만, 그 방향은 다른 어떤 학문 분야보다 철학에 의해 더 많이 결정되어 왔다. 과학적 방법 자체가 의미, 진리, 지식의 본질에 대한 철학적 탐구에서 성장했으며, 이 탐구는 오늘날 철학 분야에서 계속되고 있다. 동시에, 윤리 철학은 우리가 과학자들에게 수행하도록 허용하는 실험의 유형을 결정한다. 결국, 하나는 관찰 가능한 데이터에, 다른 하나는 의미와 가치에 관심을 가질 수 있지만, 과학도 철학도 진공 속에 존재하지 않는다.

 

---

풀이 흐름

이 지문의 핵심 논지는 ”과학과 철학은 분리된 것처럼 보이지만 깊이 연결되어 있다"는 것이다. 특히 과학적 방법의 기원에 대한 서술을 정확히 파악하는 것이 핵심이다.

지문은 ”The scientific method itself grew out of philosophical inquiry into the natures of meaning, truth, and knowledge”라고 명시한다. 즉, 과학적 방법은 철학적 탐구에서 "성장했다(grew out of)" — 철학적 전통과 지적 영향으로부터 발전한 것이다.

따라서 과학적 방법이 어떤 철학적 전통이나 지적 영향과도 ”독립적으로 발전했다(developed independently of)”고 서술하는 선지가 있다면, 이는 지문과 정면으로 모순된다.

---

전체 선지 분석

 

선지	판정	근거
① Philosophy deals with areas of speculation that may never be definitively proven through experimentation.	✅ 일치	지문의 “philosophy goes beyond the facts and into areas of speculation that probably can never be proven”과 직접 대응.
② The scientific method developed independently of any philosophical tradition or intellectual influence.	❌ 불일치	지문은 ”The scientific method itself grew out of philosophical inquiry”라고 명시. developed independently of ↔ grew out of로 정반대. 과학적 방법은 철학과 독립적으로 발전한 것이 아니라 철학적 탐구에서 성장했다.
③ There is significant overlap between the domains of science and philosophy despite their apparent differences.	✅ 일치	지문의 “there is considerable overlap”과 정확히 대응. significant = considerable.
④ Ethical philosophy plays a role in shaping the kinds of experiments that scientists are permitted to conduct.	✅ 일치	지문의 “the philosophy of ethics determines the types of experiments we allow our scientists to carry out”와 직접 대응. plays a role in shaping = determines, permitted = allow.
⑤ Science focuses on observable data while philosophy is more concerned with meanings and values.	✅ 일치	지문의 “one may be concerned with observable data and the other with meanings and values”와 정확히 대응.

 

---

핵심 문장 정리

“The scientific method itself grew out of philosophical inquiry into the natures of meaning, truth, and knowledge.”

 

이 문장이 ②번 선지의 오류를 판별하는 결정적 근거다. 지문은 과학적 방법이 철학적 탐구에서 ”성장했다(grew out of)”고 서술하여 철학과의 깊은 연결을 밝히는 반면, ②번은 과학적 방법이 어떤 철학적 전통이나 지적 영향과도 ”독립적으로 발전했다(developed independently of)”고 정반대로 서술했다.

---

한 줄 정리

과학적 방법은 어떤 철학적 전통과도 "독립적으로 발전한" 것이 아니라, 의미·진리·지식에 대한 "철학적 탐구에서 성장한" 것이다.

 

---

The Makings의 DAY 34 변형문제는 총 11개의 유형으로 구성되어 있습니다.

1. 빈칸 채우기(객관식)

2. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/한글 선택지)

3. 글의 내용 일치/불일치(객관식/영어 선택지)

4. 글 끼어 넣기(객관식)

5. 어법(서술형)

6. 어휘(서술형)

7. 주제문(객관식/영어 선택지)

8. 어휘 빈칸 채우기(서술형)

9. 영작(서술형)

10. 요약문 완성하기(서술형)

11. 문단 재배열 하기(객관식)

---

 

 

더메이킹스(The Makings)가 제작한 수능실감 영어 독해 5문항 모의고사 300제

DAY 34(55문항) 변형문제의 지문입니다.

 

1번 지문

It's tempting to see a strong dividing line between philosophy and science. After all, science is precise and defined by proven, concrete facts, whereas philosophy goes beyond the facts and into areas of speculation that probably can never be proven. Still, there is considerable overlap. Science may rely on cold, hard facts, but its directions have been determined by philosophy more than by any other area of study. The scientific method itself grew out of philosophical inquiry into the natures of meaning, truth, and knowledge, and these inquiries continue today in the fields of philosophy. At the same time, the philosophy of ethics determines the types of experiments we allow our scientists to carry out. In the end, one may be concerned with observable data and the other with meanings and values, but neither science nor philosophy exists in a vacuum.

 

2번 지문

Each dolphin has its own vocalization that is referred to as a signature whistle, and it will remain relatively unchanged throughout the animal's relatively long lifetime. The whistles are used in a variety of behavioral contexts, but during studies of captive animals Vincent Janik and Peter Slater have shown that they are particularly commonly heard in situations where an animal has become isolated from the other members of its pod. It is supposed that these animals effectively call out their "name" when they emit their signature whistle and thereby broadcast their identity and give away their location. Once the separated animals are reunited, signature whistle broadcasting stops. So at least one function of the whistles is the maintenance of group cohesion.

 

3번 지문

Elderspeak is characterized by several components. Which ones are beneficial for older adults and which ones are not helpful? Kemper and Harden had older adults watch a videotape in which a speaker described a route that was also traced on a map. The older adults reported that the instructions were easier to follow when the speaker reduced the grammatical complexity and used semantic elaboration. Simpler grammar and semantic elaboration also helped older adults improve their accuracy when they had to reproduce the same route on a map of their own. In contrast, shortening the length of the speaker's utterances into two- and five-word sentences did not improve the older adults' comprehension of the instructions, nor did it improve their performance when they traced a map of their own. Also, the older listeners did not find that an extremely slow rate of speaking with many pauses or exaggerated prosody was helpful.

 

4번 지문

The freedom to choose one's identity is critical, since the sources of identity are shifting from "belonging" to "achievement." Speaking for many, Kymlicka says that "identification is more secure, less liable to be threatened, if it does not depend on accomplishment." But this is absurd. Achievement increasingly is the basis for a satisfying life. To be sure, some people want unconditional acceptance by their "in" group. But more and more, people in rich countries achieve many of their identities. They choose their careers, friendships, allies, mixing and matching pieces and styles. Even their ethnic, racial, and national affiliations are forged in various ways, despite the fact that a person's self-image depends partly on how he's viewed by others. Indeed, the ability to make one's own self is the essence of freedom. A good society recognizes and does not pit roots and wings against one another. If roots are the necessary condition for happiness, then wings are the sufficient condition. A good life is not possible without both.

 

5번 지문

To explore the effects of mood on communication, researchers asked either happy or sad participants to accept or reject the videotaped statements of targets who were questioned after a staged theft, and were either guilty, or not guilty. The targets were instructed to either steal or leave in place a movie pass in an empty room, unobserved by anyone, and then deny taking the movie ticket. So some targets were lying and some were telling the truth when denying the theft. Those in a positive mood were more likely to accept denials as truthful. Sad participants made significantly more guilty judgements, and were significantly better at correctly detecting deceptive (guilty) targets. Negative affect thus improved the accurate distinction of truths from lies in the observed interviews. A signal detection analysis also confirmed that sad judges were more accurate in detecting deception (identifying guilty targets as guilty) than were neutral or happy judges, consistent with the predicted mood-induced processing differences.